Life history approaches to access and retention of nontraditional students in higher education: A cross-European approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela0062Keywords:
Higher education, adult students, retention, Bourdieu, WinnicottAbstract
Higher education participation has become an important focus for policy debate as well as for scholarly research. Partly this results from ongoing attempts to expand the higher education system in line with wider policies promoting a 'knowledge economy'; and partly it results from widespread policy concerns for equity and inclusion. In both cases, researchers and policymakers alike have tended to focus on access and entry to the system, with much less attention being paid to the distribution of outcomes from the system. This paper reports on a multi-country study that was aimed at critically understanding the experiences of non-traditional students in higher education, and in particular on the factors that helped promote retention. In doing so, the study straddles the sociology of social reproduction and the psychosociology of learner transformations.Metrics
References
Alheit, P. (1995). Biographical Learning. Theoretical outline, challenges and contradictions of a new approach in adult education. In P. Alheit, A. Bron-Wojciechowska, E. Brugger & P. Dominicé (Eds.), The Biographical Approach in European Adult Education (pp. 57-74). Vienna: Verband Wiener Volksbildung.
Alheit, P. & Dausien, B. (2002). The “Double Face” of Lifelong Learning: Two analytical perspectives on a “silent revolution”. Studies in the Education of Adults, 34(1), 3-22.
Biesta, G., Field, J., Hodkinson, P., Macleod, F., & Goodson, I. (2011). Improving Learning through the Lifecourse: Learning lives. London: Routledge.
Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 1-8. doi: 10.2307/2088165
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.
Clarke, P. (2008). Psycho-social research; relating self, identity and otherness. In S. Clarke, H. Hahn & P. Hoggett, Object relations and social relations (pp. 113-135). London: Karnac.
Côté, J. (2005). Identity capital, social capital and the wider benefits of learning: generating resources facilitative of social cohesion. London Review of Education, 3(3), 221-237. doi: 10.1080/14748460500372382
Council of the European Union (2010). Council conclusions on the social dimension of education and training. Brussels: European Commission.
Field, J., Gallacher, J. & Ingram, R. (2009). Learning transitions: research, policy, practice. In J. Field, J. Gallacher & R. Ingram (Eds.), Researching Transitions in Lifelong Learning (pp. 1-6). London: Routledge.
Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: the moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge: Polity.
Honneth, A. (2007). Disrespect: the normative foundations of critical theory. Cambridge: Polity.
Merrill, B. (1999). Gender, Change and Identity: Mature women students in universities. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Merrill, B. & West, L. (2009). Using biographical methods in social research. London: Sage.
Quinn, J. (2010). Learning communities and imagined social capital. London: Continuum.
Quinn, J., Thomas, L., Slack, K., Casey, L., Thexton, W. & Noble, J. (2005). From life-crisis to Lifelong Learning: Rethinking working class ‘drop-out’ from higher education. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Stanley, L. (1992). The Auto/Biographical: Theory and practice of feminist auto/biography. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Thompson, P. (1978). The Voice of the Past: Oral history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tinto, V. (1975). Drop-out from higher education: a theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89-125.
Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving College: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tonkin, E. (1995). Narrating our Pasts: The social construction of oral history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
West, L. (1996). Beyond Fragments: adults, motivation and higher education. London: Taylor & Francis.
Winnicott, D. (1971). Playing and Reality. London: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 The author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
As RELA is an open access journal, this means that anyone who can access the Internet can freely download and read the journal. There are no commercial interests for Linköping University Electronic Press or the European Society for Research on the Education of Adults (ESREA) in publishing the journal. There are no charges for publishing authors.
The core idea of open access is that copyright remains with the author(s). However, we publish with the agreement of the author that if she or he decides later to publish the article elsewhere, that the publisher will be notified, prior to any acceptance, that the article has already been published by RELA.
When publishing with RELA, it is with the agreement of the author that if they make their article available elsewhere on the internet (for example, on their own website or an institutional website), that they will do so by making a link to the article as published in RELA using the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number of the article and acknowledge in the text of the site that the article has been previously published in RELA.
