Diverse views on citizenship, community and participation
Exploring the role of adult education research and practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela0017Keywords:
Civic education, community, participatory citizen, relational citizen, indefinite citizenAbstract
In this article, we look at three photographs that each (re)present a space of citizenship and community. In examining each photo, we question our assumptions about adult education and community building practices. In each of the three cases, we adopt the same approach. We start by focusing on a particular place where present-day citizenship nowadays takes shape and observing what is to be seen at this location. This observation forces us to view that particular place in sharp focus and to direct our attention to the specific citizenship practice emerging there. This is an exercise in paying attention, which helps us to take notice of the singular way in which citizenship and community play a role in that particular context. In line with this, we also formulate some critical observations regarding a number of mainstream concepts in policy discourse such as social cohesion, active citizenship, lifelong learning, etc. These terms often represent programmes that close off the space in which an original contribution to adult education can be developed rather than opening it up. In analyzing these three images, we do not aim to construct a fully-fledged theoretical framework nor to develop a method. Rather, we wish to open the possibility of seeing things differently and altering our way of thinking.
Metrics
References
Agamben, G. (1999). Potentialities: Collected essays in philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, G. (2007). Profanations. New York: Zone Books.
Biesta, G. (2006). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. London: Paradigm Publishers.
Biesta, G. & Lawy, R. (2006). From teaching citizenship to learning democracy: Overcoming individualism in research, policy and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(1), 63-79. doi: 10.1080/03057640500490981
Brint, S. (2001). Gemeinschaft revisited: A critique and reconstruction of the community concept. Sociological Theory, 19(1), 1-23. doi: 10.1111/0735-2751.00125
Burdick, J. & Sandlin, J. (2010). Inquiry as answerability: Toward a methodology of discomfort in researching critical public pedagogies. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(5), 349-360. doi: 10.1177/1077800409358878
Casey, E. (1996). How to get from space to place in a fairly short stretch of time. In S. Feld & K. Basso (Eds.), Senses of place (pp. 13-51). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
Derschmidt, F., Schneider, K. & Hofbauer, U. (2009, September). Permanent Breakfast: Main theses and discussion-paper. Paper presented at the 4th International Seminar of the Scientific Research Community ’Plurality and Diversity in Urban Context’, Leuven.
Devisch, I. (2002). Being mondaine: Jean-Luc Nancy’s enumerations of the world. Cultural Values, 6(4), 385-394. doi: 10.1080/1362517022000047325
Devisch, I., Lijster, T. & van Rooden, A. (2009). Passanten: Over wat rest van de stad als utopie. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Wijsbegeerte, 101(2), 135-148.
Ellsworth, E. (2005). Places of learning: Media, architecture, pedagogy. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Etzioni, A. (2000). Creating good communities and good societies. Contemporary Sociology, 29(1), 188-195. doi: 10.2307/2654943
Hansen, D. (2007). On seeing the moral in teaching. In D. Hansen, M. E. Driscoll & R. Arcilla (Eds.), A life in classrooms: Philip W. Jackson & the practice of education (pp. 35-50). New York: Teachers College Press.
Harvey, D. (2003). The right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(4), 939-941. doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2003.00492.x
Lingis, A. (1994). The community of those who have nothing in common. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Masschelein, J. (2001). The discourse of the learning society and the loss of childhood. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35(1), 1-20. doi:10.1111/1467-9752.00206
Masschelein, J. (2006). Experience and the limits of governmentality. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(4), 561-576. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00211.x
Masschelein, J. (Ed.). (2008). De lichtheid van het opvoeden: Een oefening in kijken, lezen en denken. Leuven: LannooCampus.
Masschelein, J. & Simons, M. (2010). The hatred of public schooling: The school as mark of democracy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(5-6), 666-682. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00692.x
Nancy, J.-L. (1983). La communauté désoeuvrée. Aléa, 4, 11-49.
Nancy, J.-L. (1996). Être singulier pluriel. Paris: Editions Galilée.
Nancy, J.-L. (2000/1996). Being singular plural (R. Richardson, Trans.). Standford: Standford University Press. (Original work published 1996)
Nancy, J.-L. (2001). La communauté affrontée. Paris: Editions Galilée.
Panagia, D. (2009). The improper event: On Jacques Rancière’s mannerism. Citizenship Studies, 13(3), 297-308.
doi: 10.1080/13621020902850700
Pink, S. (2008). Re-thinking contemporary activism: From community to emplaced sociality. Ethnos, 73(2), 163-188. doi: 10.1080/00141840802180355
Pols, J. (2006). Washing the citizen: Washing, cleanliness and citizenship in mental health care. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 30, 77-104. doi: 10.1007/s11013-006-9009-z Pmid:16729201
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Quaghebeur, K. (2006). Pathways of participation: A critical exploration of participation as a dominant learning perspective in the world of development cooperation (Unpublished doctoral thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Leuven).
Rancière, J. (2007/1992). On the shores of politics (L. Heron, Trans.). London: Verso. (Original work published 1992)
Rancière, J. (2008). Aesthetic separation, aesthetic community: Scenes from the aesthetic regime of art. Art & Research: A Journal of Ideas, Contexts and Methods, 2(1), 1-15.
Rose, G. (2008). Using photographs as illustrations in Human Geagraphy. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(1), 151-160. doi: 10.1080/03098260601082230
Rose, N. (1996). The death of the social: Re-figuring the territory of government. Economy and Society, 25(3), 327-356. doi: /10.1080/03085149600000018
Sassen, S. (2002). Global networks, linked cities. New York: Routledge.
Sassen, S. (2003a). Citizenship Destabilized. Liberal Education, 89(2), 14-21.
Sassen, S. (2003b). The repositioning of citizenship: Emergent subjects and spaces for politics. The New Centennial Review, 3(2), 41-66.
Simons, M. & Masschelein, J. (2010). Governmental, political and pedagogic subjectivation: Foucault with Rancière. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(5-6), 588-605. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00687.x
Soenen, R. (2006). ’Stitch & split’: Een relationele versie van gemeenschap. In F. Cockx & J. De Vriendt (Eds.), ’Ne zanger is een groep’: Over gemeenschapsvorming (pp. 40-55). Brussels: SoCiuS.
Soenen, R. (2009, March). An anthropological account of ephemeral relationships on public transport and their contribution to living together. Paper presented at the 3th International Seminar of the Scientific Research Community ’Plurality and Diversity in Urban Context’, Leuven.
Thompson, C. (2010). Education and/or displacement: A pedagogical inquiry into Foucault’s ’limit-experience’. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(3), 361-377. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00373.x
Tonkens, E. & Kroese, G. (2008). Oefeningen in burgerschap in de multiculturele samenleving: Case study Omwana. (eindrapport). Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam, afdeling sociologie en antropologie. Retrieved June 29, 2009, from http://www.actiefburgerschap.nl//cms/bestanden/actief/omwana_casestudy.pdf
Trienekens, S. (2004). Urban paradoxes: Lived citizenship and the location of diversity in the arts. Tilburg: Author.
Vandenabeele, J. & Wildemeersch, D. (2010). How farmers learn about environmental issues. Reflections on a socio-biographical approach. Adult Education Quarterly. Prepublished on December 13, 2010. doi:10.1177/0741713610392770
Visker, R. (2007) Pluralisme, participatie en vertegenwoordiging: Hannah Arendt herlezend. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, 69(3), 419-445.
Wals, A. (Ed.). (2007). Social learning towards a sustainable world: Principles, perspectives, and praxis. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Press.
Wildemeersch, D. & Berkers, F. (1997). Leren is participeren. Vorming, 12(3), 161-171.
Wildemeersch, D., Jansen, T., Vandenabeele, J. & Jans, M. (1998). Social learning: a new perspective on learning in participatory systems. Journal for Continuing Education, 20, 251-265. doi: 10.1080/0158037980200210
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 The author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
As RELA is an open access journal, this means that anyone who can access the Internet can freely download and read the journal. There are no commercial interests for Linköping University Electronic Press or the European Society for Research on the Education of Adults (ESREA) in publishing the journal. There are no charges for publishing authors.
The core idea of open access is that copyright remains with the author(s). However, we publish with the agreement of the author that if she or he decides later to publish the article elsewhere, that the publisher will be notified, prior to any acceptance, that the article has already been published by RELA.
When publishing with RELA, it is with the agreement of the author that if they make their article available elsewhere on the internet (for example, on their own website or an institutional website), that they will do so by making a link to the article as published in RELA using the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number of the article and acknowledge in the text of the site that the article has been previously published in RELA.
