A European study investigating adult numeracy education
Identifying challenges and possible responses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.4833Keywords:
Numeracy, Adult Education, Challenges, Professional DevelopmentAbstract
Numeracy is a critical competency needed by adults to navigate their way through tasks in their personal and professional lives. Hence, it is critical that efforts are made to identify and address challenges that prevent adults from developing the numeracy skills needed to engage in society. In this research we identify the challenges facing adult numeracy eduction across Europe. A survey, which sought to investigate the main challenges faced by adult educators and policy-makers when delivering numeracy programmes, was distributed to leading figures in adult numeracy education in EU states. Twelve countries responded and challenges identified related to the lack of a standardised definition of numeracy, the lack of a standardised framework to support adult numeracy education and the need for professional development for adult numeracy tutors. In this paper we look at how these challenges manifest themselves in different jurisdictions and offer suggestions for overcoming these challenges in future.
Metrics
References
Archer, T. (2008). Response rates to expect from web-based surveys and what to do about it. Journal of extension. 46(3), 1-5.
Bennison, A., Goos, M., & Geiger, V. (2020). Utilising a research-informed instructional design approach to develop an online resource to support teacher professional learning on embedding numeracy across the curriculum. ZDM, 52(5), 1017-1031.
Bolstad, O. H. (2019). Teaching for mathematical literacy: School leaders' and teachers' rationales. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 93-108. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2607685
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Breen, C. (2003) Fear of Mathematics in Adults: Moving from insights to thoughtful enactive practice. Literacy and Numeracy Studies, 12(2), 65-76.
Carpentieri, J. D., Litster, J. & Frumkin, L. (2010). Adult numeracy: A review of research. National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy.
Coben, D., Colwell, D., Macrae, S., Boaler, J., Brown, M., & Rhodes, V. (2003). Adult numeracy: Review of research and related literature. National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy.
Cockcroft, W. (1982). Mathematics counts. HMSO.
Department of Education and Skills. (2011). Literacy and numeracy learning for life: The national strategy to improve literacy and numeracy among children and young people 2011-2020. DES.
Frejd, P., & Geiger, V. (2017). Exploring the notion of mathematical literacy in curricular documents. In G. Stillman, W. Blum, & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Mathematical modelling and applications: Crossing and researching boundaries in mathematics education (pp. 255-263). Springer.
Gal, I., Grotlüschen, A., Tout, D., & Kaiser, G. (2020). Numeracy, adult education, and vulnerable adults: a critical view of a neglected field. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52, 377-394.
Gal, I. (2016). Assessment of adult numeracy skills. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245573
Goos, M., Geiger, V., Dole, S., Forgasz, H., & Bennison, A. (2019). Numeracy across the curriculum: Research-based strategies for enhancing teaching and learning. Allen and Unwin.
Hoogland, K. & Diez-Palomer, J. (Eds.) (2022). Common European Numeracy Framework: Literature Overview and Review. CENF-Common European Numeracy Framework. https://cenf.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/2021-11-30-CENF-Numeracy-Literature-Overview-and-Review.pdf
Hoogland, K., Diez-Palomer, J. & O’Meara, N. (2021, July). Common European Numeracy Framework - A multifaceted perspective on numeracy [online]. The 14th International Congress on Mathematical Education, Shanghai, China.
Klinger, C. M. (2011). Addressing Adult Innumeracy via an Interventionist Approach to Mathematics Aversion in Pre-Service Primary Teachers. Adults Learning Mathematics, 6(2), 32-41.
Madison, B. L. & Steen, L. A. (2008). Evolution of numeracy and the National Numeracy Network. Numeracy, 1(1), 1-18.
Martinez, J. G., & Martinez, N. C. (1996). Math without fear. Allyn and Bacon.
Ministry of Education. (1959). 15 to 18: A report of the Central Advisory Council for Education. HMSO. http://www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/ crowther/crowther1959-1.html
Murphy, C., Lundy, L., Emerson, L. & Kerr, K. (2013). Children's perceptions of primary science assessment in England and Wales. British Educational Research Journal, 39(3), 585-606. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24463973
National Adult Literacy Agency. (2021). Good practice in integrated and standalone numeracy provision at Levels 1-3: Background report, guidelines and recommendations. NALA. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/623219
National Numeracy. (2019). Building a numerate nation: confidence, belief and skills. National Numeracy 2019 Autumn Report. https://www.nationalnumeracy.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Building_a_numerate_nation/building_a_numerate_nation_report.pdf
O’Donoghue, J. (2002). Numeracy and mathematics. Irish Mathematical Society Bulletin, 48, 47-55.
O’Meara, N., Faulkner, F., Prendergast, M. & O’Sullivan, K. (2022). Numeracy Definition Report. National Adult Literacy Agency. https://www.nala.ie/publications/numeracy-definition-report/
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). Skills matter: Further results from the survey of adult skills. OECD.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). The Assessment Frameworks for Cycle 2 of the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies. OECD.
Parsons, S., & Bynner J. (2005). Does numeracy matter more? National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1566245/1/parsons2006does.pdf
Perso, T. (2006). Issues concerning the teaching and learning of mathematics and numeracy in Australian schools. The Australian Mathematics Teacher, 62(1), 20-27.
Prendergast, M., Johnson, P., Fitzmaurice, O., Liston, M., O’Keeffe, L. & O’Meara, N. (2014). Mathematical thinking: challenging prospective teachers to do more than ‘talk the talk’. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(5), 635-647.
Quantitative Literacy Design Team. (2001). Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy, (pp. 1-22). NCED.
Quirke, S. (2018). The significant narration of mathematics teachers’ professional identities in an Irish mathematics education policy document. In Y. Shimizu, & R. Vithal (Eds.), International Commission on Mathematics Instruction Study 24 Conference Proceedings: School Mathematics Curriculum Reforms: Challenges, Changes and Opportunities (pp. 25-30). University of Tsukuba.
Richardson, F. C., & Suinn, R. M. (1972). The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19(6), 551-554.
Steen, L. A. (2001). Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy. NCED.
Swain, J., Baker, E., Holder, D., Newmarch, B., & Coben, D. (2005). Beyond the daily application: making numeracy teaching meaningful to adult learners. NRDC.
Southwood, S. (2011). Taking the fear out of maths. Adults Learning, 22(6), 14-15.
Tobias, S. (1993). Overcoming math anxiety. W.W: Norton Company.
Tout, D., Coben, D., Geiger, V., Ginsburg, L., Hoogland, K., Maguire, T., Thomson, S., & Turner, R. (2017). Review of the PIAAC Numeracy Assessment Framework: Final Report. Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1033&context=transitions_misc
United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation (2006). Education for all. Literacy for life. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000144270.locale=en
Visser, P. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Lavrakas, P. J. (2000). Survey research. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 223–252). Cambridge University Press.
Westwood, P. S. (2008). What teachers need to know about numeracy. Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dr Niamh O'Meara, Dr Kathy O'Sullivan, Prof Kees Hoogland, Prof Javier Diez-Palomer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As RELA is an open access journal, this means that anyone who can access the Internet can freely download and read the journal. There are no commercial interests for Linköping University Electronic Press or the European Society for Research on the Education of Adults (ESREA) in publishing the journal. There are no charges for publishing authors.
The core idea of open access is that copyright remains with the author(s). However, we publish with the agreement of the author that if she or he decides later to publish the article elsewhere, that the publisher will be notified, prior to any acceptance, that the article has already been published by RELA.
When publishing with RELA, it is with the agreement of the author that if they make their article available elsewhere on the internet (for example, on their own website or an institutional website), that they will do so by making a link to the article as published in RELA using the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number of the article and acknowledge in the text of the site that the article has been previously published in RELA.
