Workplace 'learning' and adult education
Messy objects, blurry maps and making difference
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela0006Keywords:
Workplace, learning theory, multiple ontologiesAbstract
This article reviews diverse representations of learning evident among published accounts of workplace learning across fields such as adult education, human resource development, management and organisation studies. The discussion critically addresses the question of how to mediate a multiplicity of definitional, ideological and purposive orientations. The argument here is that the issue is not perspectival, but ontological. The critical problem lies in mistaking learning as a single object when in fact it is enacted as multiple objects, as very different things in different logics of study and practice. Particularly in the contested arena of work as a site of economic conflict and production, learning needs to be appreciated as a messy object, existing in different states, or perhaps a series of different objects that are patched together through some manufactured linkages.
Metrics
References
Abma, T. A. (2003). Learning by telling. Management Learning, 34(2), 221-240.
doi: 10.1177/1350507603034002004
Ball, S. (Ed.). (1990). Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge. London: Routledge.
Bhaba, H. K. (1990). Nation and narration. London: Routledge.
Biesta, G.G. (2007). Beyond learning: Democratic education for a human future. Paradigm Publishers: Boulder, Colorado, US.
Billett, S. (2000). Guided learning at work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 12(7), 272-285. doi: 10.1108/13665620010353351
Billett, S. (2004). Co-participation at work: Learning through work and throughout lives. Studies in the Education of Adults, 36(2), 190-205.
Bogenrieder, I. & Nooteboom, B. (2004). Learning groups: what types are there? A theoretical analysis and empirical study in a consultancy firm. Organization Studies, 25(2), 287-299. doi: 10.1177/0170840604040045
Boud, D. (2010). Relocating reflection in the context of practice. In H. Bradbury, N. Frost, S. Kilminster & M. Zukas (Eds.), Beyond reflective practice: New approaches to professional lifelong learning (pp. 25-36). London: Routledge.
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (Eds.). (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.
Bradbury, H., Frost, N., Kilminster, S. & Zukas, M. (2010). Beyond reflective practice: New approaches to professional lifelong learning. London: Routledge.
Brady, T. & Davies, A. (2004). Building project capabilities: from exploratory to exploitative learning. Organization Studies, 25(9), 1601-1614. doi: 1177/0170840604048002
Britzman, D.P. (2009). The very thought of education: Psychoanalysis and the impossible professions. New York: State University of New York Press.
Cabrera, A. & Cabrera, E.F. (2002). Knowledge-sharing dilemmas. Organization Studies, 23(5), 687-701. doi: 10.1177/0170840602235001
Callahan, J.L. (2007).Gazing into the crystal ball: Critical HRD as a future of research in the field. Human Resource Development International, 10(1), 77-82. doi: 10.1080/13678860601170344
Cule, P. E. & Robey, D. (2004). A dual-motor, constructive process model of organizational transition. Organization Studies, 25(2), 229-240. doi: 10.1177/0170840604040037
Currie, G. & Kerrin, M. (2004). The limits of a technological fix to knowledge management: Epistemological, political and cultural issues in the case of intranet implementation. Management Learning, 35(1), 9-29. doi: 10.1177/1350507604042281
Daniels, H., Edwards, A., Engeström, Y., & Ludvigsen, S. (Eds.). (2009). Activity theory in practice: promoting learning across boundaries and agencies. London: Routledge.
Elkjaer, B. (2003). Organizational learning with a pragmatic slant. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22(5), 481-494. doi: 10.1080/0260137032000102841
Fejes, A. & Nicoll, K. (Eds.). (2008). Foucault and lifelong learning: governing the subject. London: Routledge.
Fenwick, T. (2006). Tidying the territory: Questioning the terms and purposes in work-learning research. Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(5), 265-278. doi: 10.1108/13665620610674953
Fenwick, T. (2008). Understanding relations of individual-collective learning in work: A review of research. Management Learning, 39(3), 227-243. doi: 10.1177/1350507608090875
Fenwick, T. & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. London: Routledge.
Fenwick, T. & Rubenson, K. (2005). Taking stock: a review of research in learning in work 1999-2004. Proceedings of the International Researching Work and Learning Conference. Sydney: University of Technology Sydney.
Filstad, C. (2004). How newcomers use role models in organizational socialization. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(7-8), 396-500. doi: 10.1108/13665620410558297
Fleetwood, S. (2005).Ontology in organization and management studies: A critical realist perspective. Organization, 12(2), 197-222. doi: 10.1177/1350508405051188
Fook, J. & Gardner, F. (2007). Practising critical reflection. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization, 7(2), 211-223. doi: 10.1177/135050840072001
Gherardi, S. (2009). Introduction: The critical power of the `practice lens. Management Learning, 40, 115-128. doi: 10.1177/1350507608101225
Hager, P. (2004). Lifelong learning in the workplace? Challenges and issues’. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(1-2), 22-33. doi: 10.1108/13665620410521486
Hamilton, M. (2009). Putting words in their mouths: the alignment of identities with system goals through the use of individual learning plans. British Educational Research Journal, 35(2), 221-242. doi: 10.1080/01411920802042739
Henare, A.J.M., Holbraad, M., & Wastell, S. (2006). Introduction: Thinking through Things. In A. J. M. Henare, M. Holbraad & S. Wastell, (Eds.), Thinking through things: theorising artefacts in ethnographically. London: Routledge.
Hitchin, L. & Maksymiw, W. (2009). STS in Management Education: Connecting Theory and Practice. Organization, 16(1), 57-80. doi: 10.1177/1350508408098922
Huzzard, T. (2004). Communities of domination? Reconceptualising organisational learning and power. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(5-6), 350-361. doi: 10.1108/13665620410550321
Jacobs R. L. & Washington, C. (2003). Employee development and organizational performance: a review of literature and directions for future research. Human Resource Development International, 6(3), 343-354. doi: 10.1080/13678860110096211
Jørgensen, C. H. (2004). Connecting work and education: Should learning be useful, correct or meaningful? Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(8), 455-465. doi: 10.1108/13665620410566423
Keegan, A. & Turner, J.R. (2001). Quantity versus quality in project-based learning practices. Management Learning, 32(1), 77-99. doi: 10.1177/1350507601321006
Knorr-Cetina, K. (2007). Culture in global knowledge societies: Knowledge cultures and epistemic cultures. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 32(4), 361-375. doi: 10.1179/030801807X163571
Lahn, L. & Jensen, K. (2007). Models of professional learning: Exploring the epistemic tool perspective. Knowledge, Work and Society, 4(3), 63-82.
Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.
Law, J. (2009). Multiplicity, Mess, and Modes of Enacting. Paper presented to Objects - What Matters? Technology, Value and Social Change Conference, University of Manchester (September 3 2009).
Lehesvirta, T. (2004). Learning processes in a work organization: From individual to collective and/or vice versa? Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(1-2), 92-101. doi: 10.1108/13665620410521558
Livingstone, D. W. (2001). Worker control as the missing link: Relations between paid/unpaid work and work-related learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(7-8), 308-317. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000006121
Macpherson, A., Jones, O., Zhang, M., & Wilson, A. (2003). Re-conceptualising learning spaces: Developing capabilities in a high-tech small firm. Journal of Workplace Learning, 15(6), 259-271. doi: 10.1108/13665620310488557
Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics: a word and some questions. In J. Law and J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor Network and After (pp. 74-89).Oxford: Blackwell Publishers/The Sociological Review.
Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Mulcahy, D. (2007). Managing spaces: (re)working relations of strategy and spatiality in vocational education and training. Studies in Continuing Education, 29(2), 143-162. doi: 10.1080/01580370701403266
Mulcahy, D. (2010). Assembling the accomplished teacher: the performativity and politics of professional teaching standards, Educational Philosophy and Theory. Advance online publication. Doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2009.00617.x
Mutch, A. (2003). Communities of practice and habitus: a critique. Organization Studies, 24(3), 383-395. doi: 10.1177/0170840603024003909
Nafukho, F.M., Hairston, N.R. & Brooks, K. (2004). Human capital theory: Implications for Human Resource Development. Human Resource Development International, 7(4), 545-551. doi: 10.1080/1367886042000299843
Nerland, M. (2010). Transnational discourses of knowledge and learning in professional work: Examples from computer engineering. Studies of Philosophy in Education, 29, 183-196. doi: 10.1007/s11217-009-9170-2
Nespor, J. (1994). Knowledge in motion: Space, time and curriculum in undergraduate physics and management. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
Nespor, J. (2002). Networks and contexts of reform. Journal of Educational Change, 3(3-4), 365-382. doi: :10.1023/A:1021281913741
Olesen, H. S. (2001). Professional identity as learning processes in life histories. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(7-8), 290-298. doi: 10.1108/13665620110411076
Olesen, H. S. (2007). Theorising learning in life history: A psychosocietal approach. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(1), 38-53.
Poell, R. F. & Van der Krogt, F.J. (2003). Learning strategies of workers in the knowledge-creating company. Human Resources Development International, 6(3), 387-403. doi: 10.1080/13678860210136080
Popkewitz, T. & Brennan, B. (Eds.). (1998). Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Reedy, R. (2003). Together we stand? An investigation into the concept of solidarity in management education. Management Learning, 34(1), 91-110. doi: 10.1177/1350507603034001132
Samra-Fredericks, D. (2003). A proposal for developing a critical pedagogy in management from researching organizational members’ everyday practice. Management Learning, 34(3), 291-301. doi: 10.1177/13505076030343001
Sawchuk, P. H. (2006). Activity and power. In P. Sawhcuk, N. Duarte, & M. Elhammoumi (Eds.), Critical perspectives on activity: Explorations across education, work and everyday Life (pp. 238-268). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press. Doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511509568.013
Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. Schatzki, K. Knorr Cetina & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1-14). London: Routledge.
Snell, R. S. (2002). The learning organization, sensegiving and psychological contracts: A Hong Kong case. Organization Studies, 23(4), 549-565. doi: 10.1177/0170840602234003
Stewart, J., Rigg, C. & Trehan, K. (2007). Critical human resource development: Beyond Orthodoxy. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Straka, G. A. (2000). Conditions promoting self-directed learning at the workplace. Human Resources Development International, 3(2), 241-251. doi: 10.1080/136788600402708
Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions, (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Svensson, L., Ellström, P.-E. & Aberg C. (2004). Integrating formal and informal learning at work. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(7/8), 479-492. doi: 10.1108/13665620410566441
Swan, J., Scarbrough, H. & Robertson, M. (2002). The construction of ’communities of practice’ in the management of innovation. Management Learning, 33(4), 477-497. doi: 10.1177/1350507602334005
Sørensen, E. (2009). The materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. Doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511576362
Tikkanen, T. (2002). Learning at work in technology intensive environments. Journal of Workplace Learning, 14(3), 89-98. doi: 10.1108/13665620210421902
Unwin, L., Felstead, A., Fuller, A., Bishop, D., Lee, T., Jewson, N. & Butler, P. (2007). Looking inside the Russian doll: the interconnections between context, learning and pedagogy in the workplace. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 15(3), 333-348. doi: 0.1080/14681360701602232
Usher, R. & Edwards, R. (2007). Lifelong Learning – Signs, discourses, practices. Netherlands: Springer.
Verran, H. (2001). Science and an African Logic. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225-246. doi: 10.1177/135050840072002
West, L. (2004). Doctors on the edge: General practitioners, health, and learning in the inner city. London: Free Association Books.
Wiethoff, C. (2004). Motivation to learn and diversity training: Application of the theory of planned behavior. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(3), 263-278. doi: 10.1002/hrdq.1103
Wood, M. & Ferlie, E. (2003). Journeying from Hippocrates with Bergson and Deleuze. Organization Studies, 24(1), 47-64. doi: 10.1177/0170840603024001680
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 The author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
As RELA is an open access journal, this means that anyone who can access the Internet can freely download and read the journal. There are no commercial interests for Linköping University Electronic Press or the European Society for Research on the Education of Adults (ESREA) in publishing the journal. There are no charges for publishing authors.
The core idea of open access is that copyright remains with the author(s). However, we publish with the agreement of the author that if she or he decides later to publish the article elsewhere, that the publisher will be notified, prior to any acceptance, that the article has already been published by RELA.
When publishing with RELA, it is with the agreement of the author that if they make their article available elsewhere on the internet (for example, on their own website or an institutional website), that they will do so by making a link to the article as published in RELA using the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number of the article and acknowledge in the text of the site that the article has been previously published in RELA.