Leading Intergenerational Learning in Organizations: An Example from Turkey
Keywords:Adult’s learning, intergenerational leadership, Intergenerational learning, learning in organizations
Within the fact that there are members of different generations in organizations nowadays, intergenerational learning in organizations has become more and more important. Some managers are observed to confuse about how to lead intergenerational learning environments in their organizations which makes important to conduct a research on this problem. Thus, this study was conducted and it aimed to understand the intergenerational learning process and how to lead it in a production facility in Turkey. The study group includes 61 people who are employees, team leaders, department directors, field directors and instructors. The study was carried out in the phenomenological research design. The data were gathered through interviews and analysed with content analysis. The results brought out six main themes, which are which are creating zone, acting according to generational differences, increasing motivation, supporting personal development, recording and managing “know-how”, and creating intergenerational respect and understanding.
Baily, C. (2009). Reverse intergenerational learning: a missed opportunity? AI & Society, 23(1), 111-115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0169-3
Bayhan, V. (2014). Milenyum veya (Y) ku?ag? gençli?inin sosyolojik ba?lam?. Gençlik Ara?t?rmalar? Dergisi, 2(3), 8-25.
Becerikli, S. Y. (2013). Ku?aklararas? ileti?im farkl?l???: Bilim teknoloji ve yenilik haberleri üzerinden bir odak grup çal??mas?. Selçuk Üniversitesi ?leti?im Fakültesi Akademik Dergisi, 8(1), 5-18.
Bontekoning, A.C. (2007). “Generaties in Organisaties” (Generations in organisations) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tilburg University, Tilburg.
Bottery, M. (2016). The Future of Intergenerational Learning: Redefining the Focus? Studia Paedagogica, 21(2), 9-24. Retrieved from DOI: https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2016-2-2
Booker, R. W. (2015). Organizational Learning: Perspectives Regarding Knowledge Management and the Transfer of Tacit Knowledge from one Genaration to Another, Southeastern Baptist Teological Seminery Wake Forest Faculty, Degree of Doctora: North Carolina.
Brown, C., & Henkin, N. (2012). Intergenerational Community Building: Resource Guide. Communities for All Ages. Philadelphia, PA: Intergenerational Center, Temple University.
Chen, Y. (2013). Effect of reverse mentoring on traditional mentoring functions. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 13, 199-208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LM.1943-5630.0000227
Cook, C.W., Philip, L. Hunsaker, P. L., Robert E., & Coffey, R.E. (1997). Management and organizational behavior. Chicago: Iwin, The Mc Graw Hill Book Companies, Inc.
Corrigan, T., McNamara, G., & O'Hara, J. (2013). Intergenerational learning: A valuable learning experience for higher education students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 52, 117-136.
Crumpacker, M., & Crumpacker. J. M. (2007). Succession planning and generational stereotypes: should HR consider age-based values and attitudes a relevant factor or a passing fad? Public Personnel Management, 36(4), 349-369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600703600405
Dalo?lu, E. S. (2013). Çal??ma alg?s? üzerine ku?aklararas? bir analiz (Master dissertation). Yasar Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu.
Dey, I. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.
Dorczak, R., & Portela Pruaño, A. (2020). Generational diversity and intergenerational collaboration in teaching and schools: An introduction. In R. Dorczak & A. P. Pruaño (Eds.), Generational diversity and intergenerational collaboration among teachers: Perspectives and experience (pp. 7-18). Krakow: Monografie i Studia Instytutu Spraw Publicznych Uniwersytetu Jagiello?skiego.
Gerpott, F. H., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Voelpel, S. C. (2017). A phase model of intergenerational learning in organizations. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(2), 193-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0185
Grootendorst, P., Piérard, E., & Shim, M. (2009). Life-expectancy gains from pharmaceutical drugs: a critical appraisal of the literature. Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research, 9(4), 353-364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1586/erp.09.35
Guérin-Marion, C., Manion, I., & Parsons, H. (2018). Leading an intergenerational workforce: an integrative conceptual framework, International Journal of Public Leadership, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-11-2016-0046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-11-2016-0046
Hammill, G. (2005). Mixing and managing four generations of employees. Available at: http://www.fdu.edu/newspubs/magazine/05ws/generations.htm (accessed February 30, 2019).
Hiçy?lmaz, G. & Polat, S. (2020). Intergenerational solidarity among primary school teachers: Intergenerational solidarity experiences in Turkey sample. In R. Dorczak & A. P. Pruaño (Eds.), Generational diversity and intergenerational collaboration among teachers: Perspectives and experience (pp. 87-104). Krakow: Monografie i Studia Instytutu Spraw Publicznych Uniwersytetu Jagiello?skiego.
Kaplan, M., Thang, L. L., Sanchez, M., & Hoffman, J. (2016). Intergenerational Contact Zones A Compendium of Applications. University Park, PA: Penn State Extension.
Krašovec, S. J., & Kump, S. (2010). The concept of intergenerational education and learning. In N. Li?en & J. Gubalová (Eds.), Intergenerational learning and education in later life (trans. V. Melinc, M. A. Bizovi?ar, M. Kova?, & D. Findeisen) (pp. 15-25). Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts.
Lamont, R. A., Swift, H. J., & Abrams, D. (2015). A review and metaanalysis of age-based stereotype threat: Negative stereotypes, not facts, do the damage. Psychology and Aging, 30, 180-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038586
Mannheim, K. (1952). Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Murphy, C. (2018). Age Friendly Universities: The potential to collaborate with day and social centers for older people. Paper session presented at the Age-Friendly Universities Conference, Croke Park, Dublin.
Olkinuora, E., Rinne, R., Mäkinen, J., Järvinen, T., & Jauhiainen, A. (2008). Promises and risks of the learning society: the meanings of lifelong learning for three Finnish generations. Studies in the Education of Adults, 40(1), 40-61, DOI: 10.1080/02660830.2008.11661555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2008.11661555
Omachonu, V. K., & Einspruch, N. G. (2010). Innovation in healthcare delivery systems: A conceptual framework. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 15(1), 1-20.
P?nar, ?. (1999). Ö?renen organizasyonlarin kültürel çerçevesi. ?. Ü. ??letme Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(2), 37-78.
Polat, S., & Kazak, E. (2015). Primary school teachers' views on intergenerational learning. Educational Sciences: Theory& Practice, (15)5, 1189-1203.
Report on Intergenerational Learning and Volunteering. (2013). European Network for Intergenerational Learning (ENIL). Retrieved from http://www.enilnet.eu/Dossier_ENIL_EN2.pdf
Ropes, D., & Ypsilanti, A. (2012). Factors influencing intergenerational learning: towards a framework for organisations to ensure successful learning in older employees. In A. Barabasch & A. Dehmel (Eds.), Working and ageing: the benefits of investing in an ageing workforce (pp. 280-308). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, .
Schmidt-Hertha B., Krašovec S.J., & Formosa M. (2014). Introduction. In B. Schmidt-Hertha, S.J. Krašovec & M. Formosa (Eds.), Learning across Generations in Europe. Research on the Education and Learning of Adults. Rotterdam: SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-902-9_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-902-9
Schuller, T. (2010). Learning through life: The implications for learning in Inquiry. International Journal of Education and Ageing, 1(1), 41-51.
Schröder, M. (2018). Der Generationenmythos. Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 70, 469-494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-018-0570-6
Senbir, H. (2004). Z son insan m??, ?stanbul: O Kitaplar.
Shea, C. E. (2012). Generational differences in intrinsic and extrinsic workplace motivation.
Spannring, R. (2008). Intergenerational Learning in Organisations – Literature Report. Brussel: European Commission.
?alap, K.O. (2016). Çal??ma ya?am?nda ku?aklar: Ku?aklar?n i? ve özel ya?am dengesi ili?kin yakla??mlar? (Master dissertation). Istanbul Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
The World Bank. (2019). Fertility rate, total (births per woman)-Turkey. Retrieved from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN?locations=TR
Thomas, R. J., & Cheese, P. (2005). Leadership: Experience is the best teacher. Strategy & Leadership, 33(3), pp. 24-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570510594424
Toruntay H. (2011). Tak?m rolleri çal??mas?: X ve Y ku?a?? üzerinde kar??la?t?rmal? bir ara?t?rma. ?stanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, ?stanbul.
Vanderbeck, R., & Worth, N. (2014). Intergenerational Space. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203736920
Watt, D. (2009). Winning the Generation Wars: Making the Most of Generational Similarities and Differences in the Workforce. The Conference Board of Canada.
Woolsey, J. C. (2016). The Explonoraty Relationship Between Knowledge Sharing, Emotional Intelligence and Generational Cohorts for United States Healthcare Service Employees, Capella University, Degree of Doctora: Capella.
Y?ld?r?m, A., & ?im?ek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel ara?t?rma yöntemleri. 10. Bask?, Ankara: Seçkin Yay?nc?l?k.
Yüksekbilgili, Z. (2015). Turkiye ’de Y ku?a??n?n Ya? aral???, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (14)53, 259-267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.86949
Yusoff, W. F. W., & Kian, T. S. (2013). Generation differences in work motivation: From developing country perspective. International Journal of Economy, Management and Social Sciences, 2(4), 97-103.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Soner Polöat, Gizem Günçavd?, Y?lmazer Y?lmaz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As RELA is an open access journal, this means that anyone who can access the Internet can freely download and read the journal. There are no commercial interests for Linköping University Electronic Press or the European Society for Research on the Education of Adults (ESREA) in publishing the journal. There are no charges for publishing authors.
The core idea of open access is that copyright remains with the author(s). However, we publish with the agreement of the author that if she or he decides later to publish the article elsewhere, that the publisher will be notified, prior to any acceptance, that the article has already been published by RELA.
When publishing with RELA, it is with the agreement of the author that if they make their article available elsewhere on the internet (for example, on their own website or an institutional website), that they will do so by making a link to the article as published in RELA using the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number of the article and acknowledge in the text of the site that the article has been previously published in RELA.