The role of informal learning in adults’ literacy proficiency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.1325Keywords:
Adult literacy, informal learning, reading activities, workAbstract
This study used the PIAAC dataset to compare the effects of informal literacy learning on adults’ literacy proficiency to those of formal and non-formal learning. The study participants were Nordic adults aged 35–65 years. The statistical method was regression analysis. The results indicate that informal literacy learning had the most significant effect on Nordic adults’ literacy proficiency. Non-formal adult education had a clearly smaller effect, and formal adult education seemed to have a negative effect when background factors were controlled for. Informal learning, particularly reading outside work, had a significant effect independent of adults’ backgrounds, indicating that it offers also less-educated and unemployed adults the opportunity to develop literacy proficiency.
Metrics
References
Alambrese, J., MacArthur, C., Price, C., & Knight, D. (2011). Effects of a Structured Decoding Curriculum on Adult Literacy Learners Reading Development. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4(2), 154-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2011.555294
Albaek, K., Fridberg, T., & Rosdahl, A. (2014). Use of skills at work, cognitive foundation skills, and age. In A. Malin (Ed.), Associations between age and cognitive foundation skills in the Nordic countries. A closer look at the data (pp. 49-68). Jyväskylä: Finnish Institute for Educational Research.
Athanasou, J.A. (2012). Adult language, literacy, numeracy and problem-solving skills in the workplace. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 52(1), 173-181.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2007). Adult learning Australia, 2006-07. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Barabasch, A., Dehmel, A., & van Loo, J. (2012). Introduction: the value of investing in an ageing workforce. In Working and ageing. The benefits of investing in an ageing workforce (pp. 9-33). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/3064_en.pdf
Barton, D. (2007). Literacy. An introduction to the ecology of written language. Malden: Blackwell.
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (pp. 17-66). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
Cameron, R., & Harrison, J.L. (2012). The interrelatedness of formal, non-formal and informal learning: Evidence from labour market program participants. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 52(2), 277-309.
Carliner, S. (2012). Informal learning basics. Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press.
Council of the European Union. (2018). Council recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning. Official Journal of the European Union, C189, 4.6.2018, Annex. https://eurlex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)&rid=7
Denis, V. (2014). Users guide for a SAS macro enabling the computation of design based standard errors in the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). http://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/PIAAC%20SAS%20Macro%20User%20Guide%20-%202.2.pdf
Desjardins, R. (2003). Determinants of literacy proficiency: a lifelong-lifewide learning perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 205-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2004.04.004
Desjardins, R., & Ederer, P. (2015). Socio-demographic and practice-oriented factors related to proficiency in problem solving: a lifelong learning perspective. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 34(4), 468-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2015.1060027
Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 113-136. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709900158001
Findahl, O. (2012). Barn och ungas medieanvändning i Internet-världen. Göteborg: Nordicom.
Fragoso, A., & Kurantowicz, E. (2016). Editorial: Non-traditional participants in adult education and learning. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 7(2), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.relae11
de Greef, M., Segers, M., & Verté, D. (2012). Understanding the effects of training programs for vulnerable adults on social inclusion as part of continuing education. Studies in Continuing Education, 34(3), 357-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2012.664126
de Greef, M., Verté, D., & Segers, M. (2015). Differential outcomes of adult education on adult learners increase in social inclusion. Studies in Continuing Education, 37(1), 62-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2014.967346
Green, D.A., & Riddell, W.C. (2012). Ageing and literacy skills: Evidence from Canada, Norway and the United States. Labour Economics, 22, 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2012.08.011
Gustafsson, J.E. (2016). Lasting effects of quality of schooling: Evidence from PISA and PIAAC. Intelligence, 57, 66-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.05.004
Guthrie, J., & Wigfield, A. (2000): Engagement and motivation in reading. In M.L. Kamil, & P. B. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research Vol. III (pp. 403-422). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Herkman, J., & Vainikka, E. 2012. Lukemisen tavat. Lukeminen sosiaalisen median aikakaudella. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2013). New Literacies: A Dual-level Theory of the Changing Nature of Literacy, Instruction, and Assessment. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (6th ed.) (pp. 1150-1181). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. https://doi.org/10.1598/0710.42
Livingstone, D. (2000). Exploring the icebergs of adult learning: Findings of the first Canadian survey of informal learning practices. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
Marsick, V.J., & Watkins, K.E. (2001). Informal and incidental learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 89, 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.5
Marsick, V.J., Watkins, K.E., Callahan, M.W., & Volpe, M (2008). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. In M.C. Smith, & N. DeFrates-Densch (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Adult Learning and Development (pp. 570-599). New York: Routledge.
Mellander, E. (2014). The role of work experience for skills: Findings for the Nordic countries based on the PIAAC survey. In A. Malin (Ed.), Associations between age and cognitive foundation skills in the Nordic countries. A closer look at the data (pp. 131-170). Jyväskylä: Finnish Institute for Educational Research.
Mellander, E., & Anderssen, A. F. (2015). An overview of the characteristics of the Nordic region. In T. Fridberg, A. Rosdahl, V. Halapuu, A. Valk, A. Malin, R. Hämäläinen, A.F. Anderssen, B. BjØrkeng, H. StØrset, J. SØnnesyn, A.-C. Larsson, P- Lind, & E. Mellander (Eds.), Adult skills in the Nordic region. Key information-processing skills among adults in the Nordic region (pp. 39-52). TemaNord 2015: 535. Nordic Council of Ministers.
Mellard, D., Becker Patterson, M., & Prewett, M. (2007). Literacy Practices Among Adult Education Participants. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 188-213. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.42.2.1
OECD. (2000). Literacy in the Information Age. Final Report of the International Adult Literacy Survey. Paris & Ottawa: OECD & Statistics Canada. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264181762-en
OECD. (2005). The role of the national qualifications system in promoting lifelong learning. Report from Thematic Group 2: Standards and quality assurance in qualifications with special reference to the recognition of non-formal and informal learning. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2012). Literacy, Numeracy and Problem Solving in Technology-Rich Environments: Framework for the OECD Survey of Adult Skills. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264128859-en
OECD. (2013a). OECD Skills Outlook 2013: First Results from the Survey of Adult Skills. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2013b). The Survey of Adult Skills: Readers Companion. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2015). Skills Matter: Further Results from the Survey of Adult Skills. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2016). Technical Report of the Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC). 2nd Edition. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/PIAAC_Technical_Report_2nd_Edition_Full_Report.pdf
Reder, S. (1994). Practice-engagement theory: A sociocultural approach to literacy across languages and cultures. In B. M. Ferdman, R. M. Weber, & A. G. Ramirez (Eds.), Literacy across languages and cultures (pp. 33-74). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Reder, S. (2009). The Development of Literacy and Numeracy in Adult Life. In S. Reder and J. Bynner (Eds.), Tracking Adult Literacy and Numeracy Skills: Findings from Longitudinal Research (pp. 59-84). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203888889
Rutkowski, L., von Davier, M., & Rutkowski, D. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of international large-scale assessment. Background, technical issues, and methods of data analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16061
Sabatini, J., Shore, J., Holtzman, S., & Scarborough, H. (2011). Relative Effectiveness of Reading Intervention Programs for Adults with Low Literacy. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4(2), 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2011.555290
Schmidt-Hertha, B., & Strobel-Dümer, C. (2013). Computer Literacy Among the Generations: How Can Older Adults Participate in Digital Society? In G.K. Zafiris, & M.N. Gravani (Eds.), Challenging the European Area of Lifelong Learning: a Critical Response (pp. 31-40). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7299-1_3
Schugurensky, D. (2000). The forms of informal learning: Towards a conceptualization of the field. NALL Working Paper #19-2000. Toronto: Ontario Institute for the Studies in Education.
Smith, M.C. (1996). Differences in adults reading practices and literacy proficiencies. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(2), 196-219. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.31.2.5
Smith, M. C. (2000). The real-world reading practices of adults. Journal of Literacy Research, 32(1), 25-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862960009548063
Statistics Finland. (2015). Väestön tieto- ja viestintätekniikan käyttö 2015. Helsinki: Statistics Finland. http://www.stat.fi/til/sutivi/index.html
Sulkunen, S. (2002). Suomalaisten aikuisten vapaa-ajan lukemistottumukset. Lukukokeen laatijan näkökulma. In E. Mattila, & E. Olkinuora (Eds.), Koulutus, kasvatus ja arviointi. Kasvatustieteellisiä arviointitutkimuksia koulutuksen kehittämiseksi (pp. 43-57). Turku: Publications of the Faculty of Education, University of Turku.
Sulkunen, S., & Malin, A. (2014). Adult education and training in the Nordic countries. In A. Malin (Ed.), Associations between age and cognitive foundation skills in the Nordic countries: a closer look at the data (pp. 69-93). Jyväskylä: Finnish Institute for Educational Research.
Sulkunen, S., & Malin, A. (2018). Literacy, Age and Recentness of Education Among Nordic Adults. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(5), 929-948. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1324898
Taylor, M. C. (2006). Informal adult learning and everyday literacy practices. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 49(6), 500-509. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.49.6.5
Tjepkema, S. (2002). The learning infrastructure of self-managing work teams. Enschede: Twente University Press.
White, S., Chen, J., & Forsyth, B. (2010). Reading-Related Literacy Activities of American Adults: Time Spent, Task Types, and Cognitive Skills Used. Journal of Literacy Research, 42, 276-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/1086296X.2010.503552
WHO. (2002). Active Ageing. A Policy Framework. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/67215/WHO_NMH_NPH_02.8.pdf;jsessionid=44FF4BC9B61B3D76E47326ECBECBC9A7?sequence=1
Wildemeersch, D., & Jütte, W. (2017). Editorial: digital the new normal - multiple challenges for the education and learning of adults. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 8(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.relae13
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Sari Sulkunen, Kari Nissinen, Antero Malin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As RELA is an open access journal, this means that anyone who can access the Internet can freely download and read the journal. There are no commercial interests for Linköping University Electronic Press or the European Society for Research on the Education of Adults (ESREA) in publishing the journal. There are no charges for publishing authors.
The core idea of open access is that copyright remains with the author(s). However, we publish with the agreement of the author that if she or he decides later to publish the article elsewhere, that the publisher will be notified, prior to any acceptance, that the article has already been published by RELA.
When publishing with RELA, it is with the agreement of the author that if they make their article available elsewhere on the internet (for example, on their own website or an institutional website), that they will do so by making a link to the article as published in RELA using the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number of the article and acknowledge in the text of the site that the article has been previously published in RELA.
