Changing the Subject
A Community of Philosophical Inquiry in Prisons
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.ojs981Keywords:
Community of Philosophical Inquiry (CoPI), Critical reasoning, Discourses, Positionality, Prison education, ReflexivityAbstract
This article reports on part of a project that introduced philosophy programmes to a number of Scottish prisons. It centres on the deployment within these prisons of McCall’s(1991) Community of Philosophical Inquiry (CoPI). It provides a rationale for, and analyses the participation structure, of CoPI, setting out how its communicative constraints and demands provided prisoners with novel means of reasoning and engaging in dialogue with others and with oneself. In interviews conducted with a sample of participants, they described how the critical listening to, and reasoning with, each other in CoPI tutorials had allowed them to develop greater self-awareness and a more reflexive understanding of their own thinking and actions. Findings are framed within sociocultural theorising on literacies, learning and identity. Drawing on Holland, Lachicotte, Skinner & Cain (1998) account of identity and agency, we show how CoPI afforded participants a new positionality and discursive practices.
Metrics
References
Bakhtin, N.M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin. M. E. Holquist (Ed.), C.
Emerson & M. Holquist (Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Biesta, G. (2017). Touching the soul? Exploring an alternative outlook for philosophical work with children and young people. Childhood and philosophy, 13(28), 415-52. https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2017.30424
Cassidy, C. (2017). Grown-upness or living philosophically? Childhood and philosophy, 13(28), 481-492. https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2017.30012
Daniel, M., & Auriac, E. (2011). Philosophy, Critical thinking and Philosophy for Children. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(5), 415-435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00483.x
Finlay, L. (2014). Engaging Phenomenological Analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(2), 121- 141. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.807899
Frost, Robert. Mountain Interval (1920) New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Gee, J.P. (1990). Social Linguistics and Literacies. London: Falmer Press.
Gee, J.P. (2008). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses (3rd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203944806
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Heidegger, M. (1968). What is called thinking? New York: Harper & Row.
Holstein, J.A., & Gubrium, J.F. (2011). Animating Interview Narratives. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research (3rd ed.) (pp. 149-1670). London: Sage.
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
House of Commons Library, Briefing Paper Number CBP-04334.
Improving the Delivery of Purposeful Activity (SPS Annual Report & Accounts 2017-18)
Janks, H. (2010). Literacy and Power. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203869956
Janks, H. (2014). Doing Critical Literacy: Texts and Activities for Students and Teachers. New York / London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203118627
Kennedy, D. (2004). The Role of a Facilitator in a Community of Philosophical Inquiry. Metaphilosophy, 35(5), 744-765. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2004.00348.x
Literacy Principles and Practices Paper, Scottish Government
Malone, M. J. (1997). Worlds of Talk: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
McCall, C. (1991). The 1991 Stevenson Lectures in Citizenship. Glasgow: Glasgow University Press.
McCall, C.C. (2009). Transforming thinking: philosophical inquiry in the primary and secondary classroom. London / New York: Routledge.
Nofsinger, R.E. (1991). Everyday Conversation. Newbury Park / London: Sage.
Nolda, S. (2014). Interactional power: observing and identifying power in interaction analyses of adult education situations depending on power notions and data types. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 5(1), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7462.rela9027
Rawls, A. (1989). Language, self and social order: a reformulation of Goffman and Sacks. Human Studies, 12, 147-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00142843
Scottish Prison Service annual report & accounts, (2014). Unlocking Potential Transforming Lives.
Shaw, R. (2010). Embodying Reflexivity within Experiential Qualitative Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7(3), 233-243. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880802699092
Šimenc, M. (2008). The status of the subject in the classroom community of inquiry. School Field, 6(3), 323-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878508095587
Smith, J.A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. Los Angeles, Calif.: Sage.
Szifris, K. (2014). Philosophy in Low Moss Prison: Evaluating the impact and relevance of teaching philosophy in prisons. Final report for the Scottish Prison Service and New College Lanarkshire. ESRC funded. Cambridge: Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge.
Szifris, K. (2016). Philosophy in Prisons: Opening Minds and Broadening Perspectives through Philosophical Dialogue. Prison Service Journal, 225, 33-38.
Szifris, K. (2017). Socrates and Aristotle: The Role of Ancient Philosophers in the Self-Understanding of Desisting Prisoners. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 56(4), 419-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12211
Szifris, K. (2018). Teaching philosophy to prisoners can help transform macho prison culture. Retrieved January 30, 2019, from https://www2.mmu.ac.uk
Tett, L., Anderson, K., McNeill, F., Overy, K., & Sparks, R. (2012). Learning, rehabilitation and the arts in prisons: a Scottish case study. Studies in the Education of Adults, 44(2), 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2012.11661631
Vasquez, V.M., Tate, S. L., & Harste, J.C. (2013). Negotiating Critical Literacies with Teachers: Theoretical Foundations and Pedagogical Resources for Pre-service and In-service Contexts. New York / London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203081778
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Yardley, L. (2000). Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychology & Health, 15(2), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440008400302
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Mary Bovill, Charles Anderson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
As RELA is an open access journal, this means that anyone who can access the Internet can freely download and read the journal. There are no commercial interests for Linköping University Electronic Press or the European Society for Research on the Education of Adults (ESREA) in publishing the journal. There are no charges for publishing authors.
The core idea of open access is that copyright remains with the author(s). However, we publish with the agreement of the author that if she or he decides later to publish the article elsewhere, that the publisher will be notified, prior to any acceptance, that the article has already been published by RELA.
When publishing with RELA, it is with the agreement of the author that if they make their article available elsewhere on the internet (for example, on their own website or an institutional website), that they will do so by making a link to the article as published in RELA using the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number of the article and acknowledge in the text of the site that the article has been previously published in RELA.
